Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    Soccer> Community> Lucky68>

    Umm Salal VS Al-Garrafa

    Qatar League
    Analysis More Tips
    Umm Salal
    Umm Salal 2
    3 Al-Garrafa
    Al-Garrafa
    Further Reading
    • ErenTIPS
      ErenTIPS Won 16/18
      Umm Salal are struggling near the bottom of the table (around 10th place on 9 points) but are motivated to improve their position. Both coaches acknowledge the difficulty and importance of this clash, highlighting tactical discipline and gaining momentum as priorities. Tend to be inconsistent; recent results show both heavy defeats and surprising wins. May play more conservatively but could exploit counter-attacks and set-pieces. Al Gharafa are league leaders entering Week 12 with 25 points and looking to solidify their title push. Al Gharafa, although league leaders, are viewed as needing to reaffirm their form, suggesting they may take this match seriously rather than rest key players. Possess a balanced attack and defense, which has kept them top of the league. Likely to retain control of possession and aim for efficient goal scoring from tight opportunities. Historical Trends & Head-to-Head Recent history strongly favors Al Gharafa, with them winning most encounters against Umm Sal
      1x2
      QAT D1 Umm Salal 2-3 Al-Garrafa
    • monster 168
      monster 168
      Umm Salal vs Al-Garrafa Overall Context Al-Garrafa are traditionally one of the stronger sides in Qatar, usually competing for top-four places and continental qualification. Umm Salal are more often involved in mid-table or relegation-zone battles, focusing on survival and grinding out results. This matchup usually favors Al-Garrafa, but Umm Salal can be difficult to break down, especially if they score first. Umm Salal Compact defensive shape Ofte play with a low block Loo to counterattack and use set pieces Physical presence Defensive organization when disciplined Dangerous on corners and free kicks eaknesses Limited creativity in open play Struggle when forced to dominate possession Vulnerable if they concede early, Sit deep Absorb pressure Try to frustrate Al-Garrafa Rely on quick breaks or dead-ball situations,
      O/U
      QAT D1 Umm Salal 2-3 Al-Garrafa
    • Chin PK4
      Chin PK4
      Umm Salal vs Al-Garrafa analysis Heres a match analysis / preview for Umm Salal vs Al-Garrafa based on typical trends, styles, and recent-season patterns (not live odds or lineups). Overall Context Competition: Qatar Stars League Match-up type: Lower-table resilience (Umm Salal) vs attacking contender (Al-Garrafa) Narrative: Can Umm Salals organization slow down Al-Garrafas firepower? Umm Salal Team Analysis Strengths Compact defensive shape, especially at home Willing to sit deep and counterattack Physical midfield presence Set-piece threat (corners, free kicks) Weaknesses Limited creativity in open play Struggles when forced to control possession Concedes chances against fast transitions Depth issues compared to top clubs Al-Garrafa Team Analysis Strengths One of the leagues more attacking sides High-quality foreign players in attack Strong wing play and quick combinations Comfortable dominating possession Weaknesses Defensive line can be exposed on counters Sometimes vulnerable agai
      AH
      QAT D1 Umm Salal 2-3 Al-Garrafa
    More Recommend
    • FSV Mainz 05 VS Heidenheimer I'm a top influencer with a long - term and stable information source. This is a set of high - quality long - term products tailored for my fans! Mainz has an average offensive finishing conversion rate of 18.3% this season, higher than Heidenheim's 15.1%. Its xG efficiency reaches 1.72, compared to 1.45 of Heidenheim, showing a stronger finishing ability. The key pass success rate of Mainz is 78.4%, leading Heidenheim's 72.9%. The value of forward passes is 0.89 times per pass, higher than Heidenheim's 0.76 times per pass. In midfield control, Mainz recovers the ball an average of 54.2 times per game, suppressing Heidenheim's 49.6 times. The speed of counter - attack is 3.2 seconds per time, better than Heidenheim's 3.8 seconds per time. In terms of high - intensity sprints, Mainz's total number of sprints (19.3km/h+) is 218, significantly higher than Heidenheim's 189. View and suggestion: Home win. Suggestion: Mainz -0.75 (Exclusive for big players). Ma
      AH
      GER D1 FSV Mainz 05 - Heidenheimer
    • Hamburger SV VS Bayer Leverkusen I'm a top influencer with a long - standing and stable information source. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for my loyal fans! Leverkusen's average offensive conversion rate this season is 15.3%, significantly higher than Hamburg's 10.8%. In terms of xG efficiency, Leverkusen scores a goal every 1.8 shots on target, while Hamburg needs 3.2 shots on target to score. The key pass success rate of Leverkusen reaches 34.7%, with a front - court passing value index of 9.8 threatening passes per game. For Hamburg, these figures are 27.2% and 6.5 respectively. Leverkusen has outstanding midfield control, with an average ball possession rate of 62% and 18.3 fast - break attacks per game. Hamburg relies on inefficient cross - passes from the flanks. The high - intensity sprinting distance of Leverkusen is 112.3 km, compared with Hamburg's 103.6 km. View and suggestion: Over goals Suggestion: Over 2.75 goals (Exclusive for big bettors) Lever
      O/U
      GER D1 Hamburger SV Postp. Bayer Leverkusen
    • Borussia Dortmund VS Werder Bremen I'm a well - known expert with a long - standing and stable information source. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for my fans! Dortmund's average offensive conversion rate this season is 14.3%, lower than the Bundesliga average of 16.8%. However, their xG efficiency reaches 2.1 times per game. Their core player, Haaland, creates 0.63 non - penalty xG every 90 minutes. On the other hand, Bremen's expected goals against (xGA) on the defensive end is 1.8 times per game, and the success rate of key forward passes is only 62.4%. Dortmund's midfield has a ball - possession rate of 63.7% and a fast transition attack speed (taking only 11.2 seconds per transition), exerting pressure on Bremen. Their total running distance in a game is 118 km, 7.3 km more than Bremen. Although Bremen has a high number of high - intensity sprints (214 times per game), their defensive interception success rate of 54.1% ranks fourth from the bottom in the le
      O/U
      GER D1 Borussia Dortmund - Werder Bremen
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.